🔗 Share this article

The Republic of South Africa's highest court has without dissent decided that all parents of new-borns are entitled to equal parental leave - a landmark ruling recognized as a significant win for gender equality and parental rights.

Existing Legislative Difference

Under the current law, mothers are granted 120 days of time off, while dads are granted just 10 days.

In its ruling, the supreme tribunal declared sections of the regulation illegal, calling it biased against male parents, and decided that mothers and fathers may now share the provided absence however they choose.

"This constitutes a pioneering advancement for equal treatment, parental health, and the destiny of fatherhood in the nation," commented Sthembiso Phakathi, establishment figure of Single Dads Network.

Judicial Background

Previously, a trial court determined particular parts of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act and the insurance law unjust and ruled that they violated the rights of multiple family structures.

The provincial court then ruled that the legislation showed bias toward types of parents unequally regarding the duration of caregiver absence and financial support obtained.

Judicial Case

The lawsuit was initiated by a partners, the Commission for Gender Equality and others, who sought to address the unequal responsibility predominantly impacting mothers, stressing that parenting responsibilities should be divided.

The petitioners argued that the present regulations treated unequally against caregivers who were not the birth mother - particularly, male parents, guardians, and guardians of infants delivered by surrogates - by granting them merely a brief period of parental leave, while the biological mother received one-third of a year.

Court Explanation

Revealing the judgment on Friday, Justice Zukisa Tshiqi stated that mothers and fathers should be entitled to divide the provided period as they deemed appropriate, labeling the existing legislation outdated and one which "unfairly burdened mothers and excluded dads".

"The protection of delivering parents to the elimination of other parents has the unfortunate consequence of continuing the belief that women are, and should be, the principal parents of children.

"The father is excluded and denied the chance to engage as a caregiver in the upbringing of the infant during the formative months of growth," she continued.

The justice said the judgment was not only about gender equality but also about preserving the dignity of parents, stressing that the main consideration of the judicial ruling was the wellbeing of children.

"The unequal treatment not only excludes caregivers but also denies children of the chance to be with their caregivers during a critical time of nurturing and acclimatization to their new environment."

Responses and Ramifications

The claimants welcomed the judgment, while attorneys warned that the determination would have far-reaching implications for employers, who will need to adjust their current leave policies to comply with the decision.

"The essence of the legal action is that it emphasizes the requirement to offer equal caregiver entitlements, understanding that caring for a baby is a shared responsibility," an official from the equality body told media outlets.

He commented the present regulations "failed to represent evolving societal norms around parenting".

Workplace legal expert an expert told government press that the decision was "a welcome and predicted conclusion" for parental rights in the country.

Application Timeline

The court has postponed its ruling of unconstitutionality for three years, providing parliament opportunity to amend the present regulations to conform to its ruling.

Meanwhile, mothers and fathers will be entitled to determine how they want to distribute the allocated time of leave.

In cases where a single guardian is has a job, that parent may take the entire absence period.